
The Economist has just launched a new series of ads in replace of their “I never read The Economist” series, which is probably the right thing to do as although the campaign had been successful it had been long running.

But I’m not sure how I feel about these new adverts. They were created by six different illustrators who were simply given to copy to work from, but were told not to be too stylistic so that the campaign had a sense of coherence, which I think is greatly aided by the limited colour palette. I like some more than others, for example the world revolves around the sun one and the curiosity as they give the sense of The Economist being a worldwide inquisitive publication, but the advert that reads “You can’t know everything about everything. But you can give it a good go,” comes across to me as quite arrogant.


In my opinion the previous campaign was perfect as it gave people who read the Economist a sense of superiority and it encouraged people who didn’t, to read it by giving them something to aspire to, and for me this one appears to be less effective (this maybe because I am comparing it to the previous campaign, which itself may not be a bad thing). But the idea behind it is apparently to broaden the appeal of the previous Economist idea of exclusivity to a wider, younger audience, which it appears the campaign could do as it is less exclusive, less of the puzzle is contained in the copy and coupled with the illustrations they are more visual and instantaneous.
